Making complex data simple and compelling
From digital device to digital evidence
Unlock your vehicle's digital evidence potential
Forensic Analysis and Enhancement
Investigating and analyzing financial records
Gain access to the online accounts of deceased loved ones
Clear, precise evidence for a messy world
Expert reports to suit your specific needs
We can locate people anywhere
Stop worrying and learn the truth
Prevent, Detect, Respond To Cyberattacks
First response is crucial. Every minute counts.
The first response is critical to reduce liability
Detection & Removing Spyware Services
Reduce your electronic risk from digital transmittals
Find out who you are really talking to
Experienced, Confidential Services
Swift, professional incident response
Complicated cases require compelling digital facts
Find, recover and document digital evidence
Bring solid evidence before a judge
Cases can be investigated using Social Media
Divorce, custody battles, and other
Win the most important battle of your life
Everything you need
Effective Expert Witness in Court
Evidence shows who is telling the truth
Subpoena power yields strong evidence
Digital evidence can build a strong defense
Examination of JPEG quantization tables has been used in digital image forensics for quite a long time. Using it an examiner can:
Solving of the first two problems is based on the fact that different image editors and firmware of different digital cameras get the same image compression quality using different unique quantization tables. These tables are like signatures, which an editor or camera leaves in a JPEG file.
If you need to identify camera model used for taking of examined picture, you can use EXIF data. But this data can be easily deleted or modified. That’s why quantization tables are more dependable data sources. You can just compare examined image’s quantization tables with quantization tables from a database, for example, FourMatch .
But, firstly, such database can’t be full. Secondly, only developers know how such databases are filled. Thirdly, not all forensic examiners has such bases.
That’s why sometimes digital image forensic examiner can’t identify model of camera used for taking the picture. But he can identify if the picture was taken with the camera he got for examination.
When an examiner compares quantization tables, he or she can be surprised.
It’s well known that any digital image editor uses separate quantization matrix for every available quality. All images saved with an editor with same quality have same quantization matrix. One can think that the same works with digital cameras. But the answer is – not always.
Most digital cameras allow to choose one of two or three qualities for picture saving. But some cameras use different quantization matrixes for the same quality. It depends on the fact, was flash used or not. The thing is – there are a lot of light and black parts on images taken with flash. Such parts can be compressed more without visible quality decreasing. So that’s what happens – pictures taken with flash are compressed more than whose taken without it.
But if we analyse pictures taken with different cameras, we learn that flash isn’t the only factor.
For example, OLYMPUS E-M10 uses different quantization matrixes for pictures taken with different ISO. You can see it on the following illustrations:
Figure 1, 2. EXIF data (partly) and quantization table of a picture taken with ISO 100
Figure 3, 4. EXIF data (partly) and quantization table of a picture taken with ISO 6400
If an examiner doesn’t know about this, his experiment may fail, because quantization table of questioned picture and quantization table of picture taken with the camera received for examination may not match. This may be because pictures are taken with same camera, but different settings.
Interests: Digital Video Forensics, Forgery Detection, Audio Forensics
Interests: Computer, Cell Phone & Chip-Off Forensics
Interests: iOS forensics, Android forensics, Mac OS X forensics, Windows forensics, Linux forensics
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Speak to a Specialist Now